Doctor Who - joy to the World - review with Spoilers

[The Doctor]

ChapGPT


**Doctor Who: Joy to the World – A Festive Sci-Fi Whirlwind**

The Doctor returns with a Christmas adventure full of time-bending drama
and quirky charm. Set across centuries, the tale centers on a mysterious
suitcase containing a star seed capable of cosmic destruction. Highlights
include the Doctor's pumpkin chai latte obsession, his humourous
fashion choices, and a dinosaur swallowing the suitcase in 4202.
(Wrong CHAPGPt 65000000BC)

The Doctor's festive escapade, Joy to the World, is a heartwarming yet
chaotic journey through time, with pumpkin chai lattes, Silurian diplomacy,
nd a suitcase harboring a deadly star. Set against the backdrop of Christmas
in London's Sandringham Hotel and the futuristic Time Hotel, this adventure
deftly weaves emotional stakes with quirky humour, personal depth, as her
grief over her mother's death in 2020 informs her choices. The suitcase bomb
-a literal star seed threatening universal annihilation-becomes a clever
metaphor for Joy's bottled-up grief and the redemptive power of connection.

Ncuti Gatwa thrives in their portrayal of the Doctor, switching between
charm and urgency. The introduction of Joy, a fiery and relatable new
companion, injects the story with personal depth, as her grief over her
mother's death in 2020 informs her choices. The suitcase bomb-a literal star
seed threatening universal annihilation-becomes a clever metaphor for Joy's
bottled-up grief and the redemptive power of connection.

The premise shines in its whimsical creativity: a hotel hosting humans
across all time periods, dinosaurs from 65 million years ago swallowing
suitcase bombs, and the Doctor improvising solutions with psychic paper
and rope from a 1953-themed room. Yet the narrative's pacing stumbles
slightly, juggling multiple timelines-2024, 2025, and 4202-leaving moments
of confusion.

The resolution, where Joy transforms into a star after taking the star seed,
is both poignant and visually spectacular. It's an uplifting message of hope,
rebirth, and the enduring light of loved ones lost, perfectly fitting
for a Christmas tale. The Doctor's interactions with Joy are occasionally
sharp, but the underlying empathy shines through.

Overall, this episode delivers classic Doctor Who magic-quirky, emotional,
and brimming with festive wonder.

The emotional core is Joy, grappling with loss while transforming
into a literal star-a poignant metaphor. While chaotic at times,
it's a touching, imaginative ride.

**Rating: 85/100**

Google Gemini is totally useless with the inputs

Myself 7.5/10

The Anita's scences are more powerful moreso than the Joy Scene.

JOy getting transformed and the End with Joy being the Light over Jesus
is still an awesome reminder of why Christianity is dominant
in today's world. BTW, Did you catch the King's Speech?

[The Doctor]

Post by The Doctor
ChapGPT
**Doctor Who: Joy to the World – A Festive Sci-Fi Whirlwind**
The Doctor returns with a Christmas adventure full of time-bending drama
and quirky charm. Set across centuries, the tale centers on a mysterious
suitcase containing a star seed capable of cosmic destruction. Highlights
include the Doctor's pumpkin chai latte obsession, his humourous
fashion choices, and a dinosaur swallowing the suitcase in 4202.
(Wrong CHAPGPt 65000000BC)
The Doctor's festive escapade, Joy to the World, is a heartwarming yet
chaotic journey through time, with pumpkin chai lattes, Silurian diplomacy,
nd a suitcase harboring a deadly star. Set against the backdrop of Christmas
in London's Sandringham Hotel and the futuristic Time Hotel, this adventure
deftly weaves emotional stakes with quirky humour, personal depth, as her
grief over her mother's death in 2020 informs her choices. The suitcase bomb
-a literal star seed threatening universal annihilation-becomes a clever
metaphor for Joy's bottled-up grief and the redemptive power of connection.
Ncuti Gatwa thrives in their portrayal of the Doctor, switching between
charm and urgency. The introduction of Joy, a fiery and relatable new
companion, injects the story with personal depth, as her grief over her
mother's death in 2020 informs her choices. The suitcase bomb-a literal star
seed threatening universal annihilation-becomes a clever metaphor for Joy's
bottled-up grief and the redemptive power of connection.
The premise shines in its whimsical creativity: a hotel hosting humans
across all time periods, dinosaurs from 65 million years ago swallowing
suitcase bombs, and the Doctor improvising solutions with psychic paper
and rope from a 1953-themed room. Yet the narrative's pacing stumbles
slightly, juggling multiple timelines-2024, 2025, and 4202-leaving moments
of confusion.
The resolution, where Joy transforms into a star after taking the star seed,
is both poignant and visually spectacular. It's an uplifting message of hope,
rebirth, and the enduring light of loved ones lost, perfectly fitting
for a Christmas tale. The Doctor's interactions with Joy are occasionally
sharp, but the underlying empathy shines through.
Overall, this episode delivers classic Doctor Who magic-quirky, emotional,
and brimming with festive wonder.
The emotional core is Joy, grappling with loss while transforming
into a literal star-a poignant metaphor. While chaotic at times,
it's a touching, imaginative ride.
**Rating: 85/100**
Google Gemini is totally useless with the inputs
Myself 7.5/10
The Anita's scences are more powerful moreso than the Joy Scene.
JOy getting transformed and the End with Joy being the Light over Jesus
is still an awesome reminder of why Christianity is dominant
in today's world. BTW, Did you catch the King's Speech?

Adding Google Gemini

Doctor Who - Joy to the World
What people tend to praise:

- Festive atmosphere: The episode captures the spirit
of Christmas and the holiday season.

- Lighthearted and heartwarming: Unlike many other Doctor Who
episodes, "Joy to the World" is a lighter and more heartwarming story.

- Interesting concept: The episode explores the concept of Christmas c
heer and its impact on different cultures.

- Good performances: Mackenzie Crook shines as the villain, Krampus,
and Matt Smith and Jenna Coleman have good chemistry.

What people tend to criticise:

- Lack of suspense: Some viewers find the episode
to be too lighthearted and lacking in suspense.

- Predictable plot: The plot is relatively
straightforward and easy to predict.

- Not very scary: While Krampus is intended to be menacing,
some viewers find him to be more comical than frightening.

My rating and thoughts:

I would rate "Joy to the World" a 6/10. It's a fun and enjoyable
episode that is perfect for the holiday season. It's not the most
complex or suspenseful episode of Doctor Who, but it's a good example
of the show's ability to be lighthearted and heartwarming. It's a good
choice for families or those who are looking for a more lighthearted
Doctor Who experience.

It has been 24 hours and still Google Gemini cannot get it right

[anim8rfsk]

Post by The Doctor
ChapGPT
**Doctor Who: Joy to the World – A Festive Sci-Fi Whirlwind**
The Doctor returns with a Christmas adventure full of time-bending drama
and quirky charm. Set across centuries, the tale centers on a mysterious
suitcase containing a star seed capable of cosmic destruction. Highlights
include the Doctor's pumpkin chai latte obsession, his humourous
fashion choices, and a dinosaur swallowing the suitcase in 4202.
(Wrong CHAPGPt 65000000BC)

Thumbs up from me

Post by The Doctor
The Doctor's festive escapade, Joy to the World, is a heartwarming yet
chaotic journey through time, with pumpkin chai lattes, Silurian diplomacy,
nd a suitcase harboring a deadly star. Set against the backdrop of Christmas
in London's Sandringham Hotel and the futuristic Time Hotel, this adventure
deftly weaves emotional stakes with quirky humour, personal depth, as her
grief over her mother's death in 2020 informs her choices. The suitcase bomb
-a literal star seed threatening universal annihilation-becomes a clever
metaphor for Joy's bottled-up grief and the redemptive power of connection.
Ncuti Gatwa thrives in their portrayal of the Doctor, switching between
charm and urgency. The introduction of Joy, a fiery and relatable new
companion, injects the story with personal depth, as her grief over her
mother's death in 2020 informs her choices. The suitcase bomb-a literal star
seed threatening universal annihilation-becomes a clever metaphor for Joy's
bottled-up grief and the redemptive power of connection.
The premise shines in its whimsical creativity: a hotel hosting humans
across all time periods, dinosaurs from 65 million years ago swallowing
suitcase bombs, and the Doctor improvising solutions with psychic paper
and rope from a 1953-themed room. Yet the narrative's pacing stumbles
slightly, juggling multiple timelines-2024, 2025, and 4202-leaving moments
of confusion.
The resolution, where Joy transforms into a star after taking the star seed,
is both poignant and visually spectacular. It's an uplifting message of hope,
rebirth, and the enduring light of loved ones lost, perfectly fitting
for a Christmas tale. The Doctor's interactions with Joy are occasionally
sharp, but the underlying empathy shines through.
Overall, this episode delivers classic Doctor Who magic-quirky, emotional,
and brimming with festive wonder.
The emotional core is Joy, grappling with loss while transforming
into a literal star-a poignant metaphor. While chaotic at times,
it's a touching, imaginative ride.
**Rating: 85/100**
Google Gemini is totally useless with the inputs
Myself 7.5/10
The Anita's scences are more powerful moreso than the Joy Scene.
JOy getting transformed and the End with Joy being the Light over Jesus
is still an awesome reminder of why Christianity is dominant
in today's world. BTW, Did you catch the King's Speech?

[The Doctor]

Post by anim8rfsk

Post by The Doctor
ChapGPT
**Doctor Who: Joy to the World – A Festive Sci-Fi Whirlwind**
The Doctor returns with a Christmas adventure full of time-bending drama
and quirky charm. Set across centuries, the tale centers on a mysterious
suitcase containing a star seed capable of cosmic destruction. Highlights
include the Doctor's pumpkin chai latte obsession, his humourous
fashion choices, and a dinosaur swallowing the suitcase in 4202.
(Wrong CHAPGPt 65000000BC)

Thumbs up from me

Thank you!

Post by anim8rfsk

Post by The Doctor
The Doctor's festive escapade, Joy to the World, is a heartwarming yet
chaotic journey through time, with pumpkin chai lattes, Silurian diplomacy,
nd a suitcase harboring a deadly star. Set against the backdrop of Christmas
in London's Sandringham Hotel and the futuristic Time Hotel, this adventure
deftly weaves emotional stakes with quirky humour, personal depth, as her
grief over her mother's death in 2020 informs her choices. The suitcase bomb
-a literal star seed threatening universal annihilation-becomes a clever
metaphor for Joy's bottled-up grief and the redemptive power of connection.
Ncuti Gatwa thrives in their portrayal of the Doctor, switching between
charm and urgency. The introduction of Joy, a fiery and relatable new
companion, injects the story with personal depth, as her grief over her
mother's death in 2020 informs her choices. The suitcase bomb-a literal star
seed threatening universal annihilation-becomes a clever metaphor for Joy's
bottled-up grief and the redemptive power of connection.
The premise shines in its whimsical creativity: a hotel hosting humans
across all time periods, dinosaurs from 65 million years ago swallowing
suitcase bombs, and the Doctor improvising solutions with psychic paper
and rope from a 1953-themed room. Yet the narrative's pacing stumbles
slightly, juggling multiple timelines-2024, 2025, and 4202-leaving moments
of confusion.
The resolution, where Joy transforms into a star after taking the star seed,
is both poignant and visually spectacular. It's an uplifting message of hope,
rebirth, and the enduring light of loved ones lost, perfectly fitting
for a Christmas tale. The Doctor's interactions with Joy are occasionally
sharp, but the underlying empathy shines through.
Overall, this episode delivers classic Doctor Who magic-quirky, emotional,
and brimming with festive wonder.
The emotional core is Joy, grappling with loss while transforming
into a literal star-a poignant metaphor. While chaotic at times,
it's a touching, imaginative ride.
**Rating: 85/100**
Google Gemini is totally useless with the inputs
Myself 7.5/10
The Anita's scences are more powerful moreso than the Joy Scene.
JOy getting transformed and the End with Joy being the Light over Jesus
is still an awesome reminder of why Christianity is dominant
in today's world. BTW, Did you catch the King's Speech?

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

[Carlos Medina]

Post by anim8rfsk

Post by The Doctor
ChapGPT
**Doctor Who: Joy to the World – A Festive Sci-Fi Whirlwind**
The Doctor returns with a Christmas adventure full of time-bending drama
and quirky charm. Set across centuries, the tale centers on a mysterious
suitcase containing a star seed capable of cosmic destruction. Highlights
include the Doctor's pumpkin chai latte obsession, his humourous
fashion choices, and a dinosaur swallowing the suitcase in 4202.
(Wrong CHAPGPt 65000000BC)

Thumbs up from me

Who ia this, Seamus?

[The Doctor]

Post by Carlos Medina

Post by anim8rfsk

Post by The Doctor
ChapGPT
**Doctor Who: Joy to the World – A Festive Sci-Fi Whirlwind**
The Doctor returns with a Christmas adventure full of time-bending drama
and quirky charm. Set across centuries, the tale centers on a mysterious
suitcase containing a star seed capable of cosmic destruction. Highlights
include the Doctor's pumpkin chai latte obsession, his humourous
fashion choices, and a dinosaur swallowing the suitcase in 4202.
(Wrong CHAPGPt 65000000BC)

Thumbs up from me

Who ia this, Seamus?

Who ? Me?

[Dorothy J Heydt]

Post by The Doctor
ChapGPT

[Hal Heydt]
Thanks for the tip off. Stopped reading right there.

[Blueshirt]

Post by Dorothy J Heydt

Post by The Doctor
ChapGPT

[Hal Heydt]
Thanks for the tip off. Stopped reading right there.

The idiot's idea of a Doctor Who episode review is to create an
artificial one, which makes it about as useful as a chocolate
teapot.

I don't know why he bothers.

[Hornplayer9599]

Post by Blueshirt

Post by Dorothy J Heydt

Post by The Doctor
ChapGPT

[Hal Heydt]
Thanks for the tip off. Stopped reading right there.

The idiot's idea of a Doctor Who episode review is to create an
artificial one, which makes it about as useful as a chocolate
teapot.
I don't know why he bothers.

For his beloved post count. It doesn't matter (to him) *what* he
posts...just that he does post.

[The Doctor]

Post by Hornplayer9599

Post by Blueshirt

Post by Dorothy J Heydt

Post by The Doctor
ChapGPT

[Hal Heydt]
Thanks for the tip off. Stopped reading right there.

The idiot's idea of a Doctor Who episode review is to create an
artificial one, which makes it about as useful as a chocolate
teapot.
I don't know why he bothers.

For his beloved post count. It doesn't matter (to him) *what* he
posts...just that he does post.

Try again!

Post by Hornplayer9599
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan

[The Doctor]

Post by Blueshirt

Post by Dorothy J Heydt

Post by The Doctor
ChapGPT

[Hal Heydt]
Thanks for the tip off. Stopped reading right there.

The idiot's idea of a Doctor Who episode review is to create an
artificial one, which makes it about as useful as a chocolate
teapot.
I don't know why he bothers.

As anim was saying ...

[Daniel70]

Post by Blueshirt

Post by Dorothy J Heydt

Post by The Doctor
ChapGPT

[Hal Heydt]
Thanks for the tip off. Stopped reading right there.

The idiot's idea of a Doctor Who episode review is to create an
artificial one, which makes it about as useful as a chocolate
teapot.
I don't know why he bothers.

He bothers ..... because it's another post he has made here .... so
increases his All-Important-Precious-Post-count!!

Nothing else matters!! If you (dare) tell him the reviews he post are
GARBAGE, he'll tell you that that's the best AI can do.

[%]

Post by Daniel70

Post by Blueshirt

Post by Dorothy J Heydt

Post by The Doctor
ChapGPT

[Hal Heydt]
Thanks for the tip off.  Stopped reading right there.

The idiot's idea of a Doctor Who episode review is to create an
artificial one, which makes it about as useful as a chocolate
teapot.
I don't know why he bothers.

He bothers ..... because it's another post he has made here .... so
increases his All-Important-Precious-Post-count!!
Nothing else matters!! If you (dare) tell him the reviews he post are
GARBAGE, he'll tell you that that's the best AI can do.

no one mentioned post counts accept you Gobble-de-gook!!

[The Doctor]

Post by %

Post by Daniel70

Post by Blueshirt

Post by Dorothy J Heydt

Post by The Doctor
ChapGPT

[Hal Heydt]
Thanks for the tip off.  Stopped reading right there.

The idiot's idea of a Doctor Who episode review is to create an
artificial one, which makes it about as useful as a chocolate
teapot.
I don't know why he bothers.

He bothers ..... because it's another post he has made here .... so
increases his All-Important-Precious-Post-count!!
Nothing else matters!! If you (dare) tell him the reviews he post are
GARBAGE, he'll tell you that that's the best AI can do.

no one mentioned post counts accept you Gobble-de-gook!!

Dannyboy is a big turkey stuffed with Idleahdns and Dr.WTF for good measure.

[The Doctor]

Post by Daniel70

Post by Blueshirt

Post by Dorothy J Heydt

Post by The Doctor
ChapGPT

[Hal Heydt]
Thanks for the tip off. Stopped reading right there.

The idiot's idea of a Doctor Who episode review is to create an
artificial one, which makes it about as useful as a chocolate
teapot.
I don't know why he bothers.

He bothers ..... because it's another post he has made here .... so
increases his All-Important-Precious-Post-count!!
Nothing else matters!! If you (dare) tell him the reviews he post are
GARBAGE, he'll tell you that that's the best AI can do.

Given the Google Gemini cannot figure out Joy to the World ...

Post by Daniel70
--
Daniel

[John Hall]

Post by Blueshirt

Post by Dorothy J Heydt

Post by The Doctor
ChapGPT

[Hal Heydt]
Thanks for the tip off. Stopped reading right there.

The idiot's idea of a Doctor Who episode review is to create an
artificial one, which makes it about as useful as a chocolate
teapot.
I don't know why he bothers.

And it looked as though most of that review was lifted by Chat/GPT from
a BBC promotional blurb for the episode.

[The Doctor]

Post by John Hall

Post by Blueshirt

Post by Dorothy J Heydt

Post by The Doctor
ChapGPT

[Hal Heydt]
Thanks for the tip off. Stopped reading right there.

The idiot's idea of a Doctor Who episode review is to create an
artificial one, which makes it about as useful as a chocolate
teapot.
I don't know why he bothers.

And it looked as though most of that review was lifted by Chat/GPT from
a BBC promotional blurb for the episode.

And not reviews from IMDB or Rotten Tomatoes.

Post by John Hall
--
John Hall
"I look upon it, that he who does not mind his belly,
will hardly mind anything else."
Dr Samuel Johnson (1709-84)

[Blueshirt]

Post by John Hall
And it looked as though most of that review was lifted by
Chat/GPT from a BBC promotional blurb for the episode.

Talking of promotional blurb, did we ever find out what was
behind that "Joy to the Worlds" thing? (Plural) I mean, nobody
visited other worlds really did they, they were just different
times on the same planet?

[John Hall]

Post by Blueshirt

Post by John Hall
And it looked as though most of that review was lifted by
Chat/GPT from a BBC promotional blurb for the episode.

Talking of promotional blurb, did we ever find out what was
behind that "Joy to the Worlds" thing? (Plural) I mean, nobody
visited other worlds really did they, they were just different
times on the same planet?

Good point. And I think it's singular in the lyrics of the carol that
must have inspired the title, so it's not obvious why it was made
plural.

But having just checked on Wikipedia, the episode's title is given there
as "Joy to the World", so we may have it wrong.

[Blueshirt]

Post by John Hall

Post by Blueshirt

Post by John Hall
And it looked as though most of that review was lifted by
Chat/GPT from a BBC promotional blurb for the episode.

Talking of promotional blurb, did we ever find out what was
behind that "Joy to the Worlds" thing? (Plural) I mean,
nobody visited other worlds really did they, they were just
different times on the same planet?

Good point. And I think it's singular in the lyrics of the
carol that must have inspired the title, so it's not obvious
why it was made plural.
But having just checked on Wikipedia, the episode's title is
given there as "Joy to the World", so we may have it wrong.

We always had it as "Joy to the World" here, as that's how the
episode was advertised by the BBC in clips and previews. It was
the promo stuff from Disney+ in November that threw the spanner
in to the works. But I've not seen an explanation for it
anywhere... <shrugs>

I mean they must have created the artwork for a reason!

Loading Image...

[Blueshirt]

Post by Blueshirt

Post by John Hall

Post by Blueshirt

Post by John Hall
And it looked as though most of that review was lifted by
Chat/GPT from a BBC promotional blurb for the episode.

Talking of promotional blurb, did we ever find out what was
behind that "Joy to the Worlds" thing? (Plural) I mean,
nobody visited other worlds really did they, they were just
different times on the same planet?

Good point. And I think it's singular in the lyrics of the
carol that must have inspired the title, so it's not obvious
why it was made plural.
But having just checked on Wikipedia, the episode's title is
given there as "Joy to the World", so we may have it wrong.

We always had it as "Joy to the World" here, as that's how the
episode was advertised by the BBC in clips and previews. It was
the promo stuff from Disney+ in November that threw the spanner
in to the works. But I've not seen an explanation for it
anywhere... <shrugs>
I mean they must have created the artwork for a reason!

https://lumiere-a.akamaihd.net/v1/images/91141_brge24_keyart_vertical_proof_copy_dbf9ca94.jpeg?region=0%2C0%2C750%2C935


Meant to add this one too...

Loading Image...

[The Doctor]

Post by Blueshirt

Post by John Hall

Post by Blueshirt

Post by John Hall
And it looked as though most of that review was lifted by
Chat/GPT from a BBC promotional blurb for the episode.

Talking of promotional blurb, did we ever find out what was
behind that "Joy to the Worlds" thing? (Plural) I mean,
nobody visited other worlds really did they, they were just
different times on the same planet?

Good point. And I think it's singular in the lyrics of the
carol that must have inspired the title, so it's not obvious
why it was made plural.
But having just checked on Wikipedia, the episode's title is
given there as "Joy to the World", so we may have it wrong.

We always had it as "Joy to the World" here, as that's how the
episode was advertised by the BBC in clips and previews. It was
the promo stuff from Disney+ in November that threw the spanner
in to the works. But I've not seen an explanation for it
anywhere... <shrugs>
I mean they must have created the artwork for a reason!
https://lumiere-a.akamaihd.net/v1/images/91141_brge24_keyart_vertical_proof_copy_dbf9ca94.jpeg?region=0%2C0%2C750%2C935

disney for you.

[John Hall]

Post by Blueshirt

Post by John Hall

Post by Blueshirt

Post by John Hall
And it looked as though most of that review was lifted by
Chat/GPT from a BBC promotional blurb for the episode.

Talking of promotional blurb, did we ever find out what was
behind that "Joy to the Worlds" thing? (Plural) I mean,
nobody visited other worlds really did they, they were just
different times on the same planet?

Good point. And I think it's singular in the lyrics of the
carol that must have inspired the title, so it's not obvious
why it was made plural.
But having just checked on Wikipedia, the episode's title is
given there as "Joy to the World", so we may have it wrong.

We always had it as "Joy to the World" here, as that's how the
episode was advertised by the BBC in clips and previews. It was
the promo stuff from Disney+ in November that threw the spanner
in to the works. But I've not seen an explanation for it
anywhere... <shrugs>
I mean they must have created the artwork for a reason!
https://lumiere-a.akamaihd.net/v1/images/91141_brge24_keyart_vertical_pr
oof_copy_dbf9ca94.jpeg?region=0%2C0%2C750%2C935

Somebody at Disney making a mistake and nobody noticing/caring?

[Blueshirt]

Post by John Hall

Post by Blueshirt

Post by John Hall

Post by Blueshirt
Talking of promotional blurb, did we ever find out what was
behind that "Joy to the Worlds" thing? (Plural) I mean,
nobody visited other worlds really did they, they were just
different times on the same planet?

Good point. And I think it's singular in the lyrics of the
carol that must have inspired the title, so it's not
obvious why it was made plural.
But having just checked on Wikipedia, the episode's title
is given there as "Joy to the World", so we may have it
wrong.

We always had it as "Joy to the World" here, as that's how
the episode was advertised by the BBC in clips and previews.
It was the promo stuff from Disney+ in November that threw
the spanner in to the works. But I've not seen an
explanation for it anywhere... <shrugs>
I mean they must have created the artwork for a reason!

https://lumiere-a.akamaihd.net/v1/images/91141_brge24_keyart_vertical_proof_copy_dbf9ca94.jpeg?region=0%2C0%2C750%2C935

Post by John Hall
Somebody at Disney making a mistake and nobody noticing/caring?

Well, we noticed it... as we discussed it here! (Here as in RADW
that is.) We didn't know why though... and I still don't!

It probably will turn out to be a mistake on the part of Disney
though... and they just decided to double-down and pretend it
was part of some 'plan'!

[The Doctor]

Post by Blueshirt

Post by John Hall

Post by Blueshirt

Post by John Hall

Post by Blueshirt
Talking of promotional blurb, did we ever find out what was
behind that "Joy to the Worlds" thing? (Plural) I mean,
nobody visited other worlds really did they, they were just
different times on the same planet?

Good point. And I think it's singular in the lyrics of the
carol that must have inspired the title, so it's not
obvious why it was made plural.
But having just checked on Wikipedia, the episode's title
is given there as "Joy to the World", so we may have it
wrong.

We always had it as "Joy to the World" here, as that's how
the episode was advertised by the BBC in clips and previews.
It was the promo stuff from Disney+ in November that threw
the spanner in to the works. But I've not seen an
explanation for it anywhere... <shrugs>
I mean they must have created the artwork for a reason!

https://lumiere-a.akamaihd.net/v1/images/91141_brge24_keyart_vertical_proof_copy_dbf9ca94.jpeg?region=0%2C0%2C750%2C935

Post by John Hall
Somebody at Disney making a mistake and nobody noticing/caring?

Well, we noticed it... as we discussed it here! (Here as in RADW
that is.) We didn't know why though... and I still don't!
It probably will turn out to be a mistake on the part of Disney
though... and they just decided to double-down and pretend it
was part of some 'plan'!

disney is not wha it was.

[The Doctor]

Post by John Hall

Post by Blueshirt

Post by John Hall

Post by Blueshirt

Post by John Hall
And it looked as though most of that review was lifted by
Chat/GPT from a BBC promotional blurb for the episode.

Talking of promotional blurb, did we ever find out what was
behind that "Joy to the Worlds" thing? (Plural) I mean,
nobody visited other worlds really did they, they were just
different times on the same planet?

Good point. And I think it's singular in the lyrics of the
carol that must have inspired the title, so it's not obvious
why it was made plural.
But having just checked on Wikipedia, the episode's title is
given there as "Joy to the World", so we may have it wrong.

We always had it as "Joy to the World" here, as that's how the
episode was advertised by the BBC in clips and previews. It was
the promo stuff from Disney+ in November that threw the spanner
in to the works. But I've not seen an explanation for it
anywhere... <shrugs>
I mean they must have created the artwork for a reason!
https://lumiere-a.akamaihd.net/v1/images/91141_brge24_keyart_vertical_pr
oof_copy_dbf9ca94.jpeg?region=0%2C0%2C750%2C935

Somebody at Disney making a mistake and nobody noticing/caring?

What do you expect from Disney?

Post by John Hall
--
John Hall
"I look upon it, that he who does not mind his belly,
will hardly mind anything else."
Dr Samuel Johnson (1709-84)

[The Doctor]

Post by John Hall

Post by Blueshirt

Post by John Hall
And it looked as though most of that review was lifted by
Chat/GPT from a BBC promotional blurb for the episode.

Talking of promotional blurb, did we ever find out what was
behind that "Joy to the Worlds" thing? (Plural) I mean, nobody
visited other worlds really did they, they were just different
times on the same planet?

Good point. And I think it's singular in the lyrics of the carol that
must have inspired the title, so it's not obvious why it was made
plural.
But having just checked on Wikipedia, the episode's title is given there
as "Joy to the World", so we may have it wrong.

A YN rumour about Worlds!

Post by John Hall
--
John Hall
"I look upon it, that he who does not mind his belly,
will hardly mind anything else."
Dr Samuel Johnson (1709-84)

[Blueshirt]

Post by The Doctor

Post by John Hall

Post by Blueshirt
Talking of promotional blurb, did we ever find out what was
behind that "Joy to the Worlds" thing? (Plural) I mean,
nobody visited other worlds really did they, they were
just different times on the same planet?

Good point. And I think it's singular in the lyrics of the
carol that must have inspired the title, so it's not obvious
why it was made plural.
But having just checked on Wikipedia, the episode's title is
given there as "Joy to the World", so we may have it wrong.

A YN rumour about Worlds!

No, it wasn't. "Your Name" posted the news here after Disney+
had released their own promotional material for "Joy to the
World" on Doctor Who Day in November. We questioned the 's' at
the time, not because YN was wrong, (most of us are online and
can read) but because we wanted to know why were Disney calling
it "Joy to the Worlds".

You were obviously too busy replying to the loons here and/or
spouting religious gibberish to pay attention.

[The Doctor]

Post by Blueshirt

Post by The Doctor

Post by John Hall

Post by Blueshirt
Talking of promotional blurb, did we ever find out what was
behind that "Joy to the Worlds" thing? (Plural) I mean,
nobody visited other worlds really did they, they were
just different times on the same planet?

Good point. And I think it's singular in the lyrics of the
carol that must have inspired the title, so it's not obvious
why it was made plural.
But having just checked on Wikipedia, the episode's title is
given there as "Joy to the World", so we may have it wrong.

A YN rumour about Worlds!

No, it wasn't. "Your Name" posted the news here after Disney+
had released their own promotional material for "Joy to the
World" on Doctor Who Day in November. We questioned the 's' at
the time, not because YN was wrong, (most of us are online and
can read) but because we wanted to know why were Disney calling
it "Joy to the Worlds".
You were obviously too busy replying to the loons here and/or
spouting religious gibberish to pay attention.

And you wonder why disney is viewed with a black eye.

[The Doctor]

Post by Blueshirt

Post by John Hall
And it looked as though most of that review was lifted by
Chat/GPT from a BBC promotional blurb for the episode.

Talking of promotional blurb, did we ever find out what was
behind that "Joy to the Worlds" thing? (Plural) I mean, nobody
visited other worlds really did they, they were just different
times on the same planet?

A bad rumour by YN.

[Blueshirt]

Post by The Doctor

Post by Blueshirt

Post by John Hall
And it looked as though most of that review was lifted by
Chat/GPT from a BBC promotional blurb for the episode.

Talking of promotional blurb, did we ever find out what was
behind that "Joy to the Worlds" thing? (Plural) I mean,
nobody visited other worlds really did they, they were just
different times on the same planet?

A bad rumour by YN.

Wrong! YN reported facts.

[The Doctor]

Post by Blueshirt

Post by The Doctor

Post by Blueshirt

Post by John Hall
And it looked as though most of that review was lifted by
Chat/GPT from a BBC promotional blurb for the episode.

Talking of promotional blurb, did we ever find out what was
behind that "Joy to the Worlds" thing? (Plural) I mean,
nobody visited other worlds really did they, they were just
different times on the same planet?

A bad rumour by YN.

Wrong! YN reported facts.

The fact Disney got it wrong?

[The Doctor]

Post by Dorothy J Heydt

Post by The Doctor
ChapGPT

[Hal Heydt]
Thanks for the tip off. Stopped reading right there.

Do look down, after all I criticise ChatGPt.

[Ubiquitous]

Post by The Doctor
ChapGPT

Wrong, as uaual.

[The Doctor]

Post by Ubiquitous

Post by The Doctor
ChapGPT

Wrong, as uaual.

Was it ever!

I still say 7/10

Post by Ubiquitous
--
Dems & the media want Trump to be more like Obama, but then he'd
have to audit liberals & wire tap reporters' phones.

[Ubiquitous]

Post by The Doctor
ChapGPT

Wrong.,