Discussion:
THE WORD JEDI IS PROBLEMATIC?! | Film Threat News
(too old to reply)
Ubiquitous
2024-07-15 08:32:03 UTC
Permalink
Why the Term ‘JEDI’ Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
Justice, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...

--
Let's go Brandon!
anim8rfsk
2024-07-15 18:18:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ubiquitous
Why the Term ‘JEDI’ Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
https://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...
This is more like scientific Canadian

Based on a paper written by a bunch of idiot academics with really stupid
titles and fields of interest
Post by Ubiquitous
--
Let's go Brandon!
--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
Pluted Pup
2024-07-15 22:40:50 UTC
Permalink
Why the Term `JEDI´ Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
https://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...
Excerpts from the complete URL for the Opinion:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problematic-for-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-inclusion/

"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they´re ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
and toxically masculine approaches to conflict resolution
(violent duels with phallic lightsabers, gaslighting by means of
"Jedi mind tricks," etc.). The Jedi are also an exclusionary
cult, membership to which is partly predicated on the possession
of heightened psychic and physical abilities (or
"Force-sensitivity"). Strikingly, Force-wielding talents are
narratively explained in Star Wars not merely in spiritual terms
but also in ableist and eugenic ones: These supernatural powers
are naturalized as biological, hereditary attributes. So it is
that Force potential is framed as a dynastic property of noble
bloodlines (for example, the Skywalker dynasty), and Force
disparities are rendered innate physical properties, measurable
via "midi-chlorian" counts (not unlike a "Force genetics" test)
and augmentable via human(oid) engineering. The heroic Jedi are
thus emblems for a host of dangerously reactionary values and
assumptions."

After that hate filled rant, the writers include a
hint of common sense:

"JEDI connects justice initiatives to corporate capital. JEDI/Jedi is more than just a name: It´s a product. Circulating that
product´s name can promote and benefit the corporation that owns
it, even if we do not mean to do so. We are, in effect, providing
that corporation-Disney-with a form of free advertising,
commodifying and cheapening our justice work in the process."

It's a brand name! But the authors "justice work" is already a
cheap and commodified product of corporate capital, and
their "racial hatred against whites is always justified"
mentality is plain sadistic and is intended to politically
sterilize whites and prevent them from criticizing Capital.
Your Name
2024-07-16 00:32:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term `JEDI´ Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
https://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problematic-for-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-inclusion/
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they´re ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
and toxically masculine approaches to conflict resolution
(violent duels with phallic lightsabers, gaslighting by means of
"Jedi mind tricks," etc.). The Jedi are also an exclusionary
cult, membership to which is partly predicated on the possession
of heightened psychic and physical abilities (or
"Force-sensitivity"). Strikingly, Force-wielding talents are
narratively explained in Star Wars not merely in spiritual terms
but also in ableist and eugenic ones: These supernatural powers
are naturalized as biological, hereditary attributes. So it is
that Force potential is framed as a dynastic property of noble
bloodlines (for example, the Skywalker dynasty), and Force
disparities are rendered innate physical properties, measurable
via "midi-chlorian" counts (not unlike a "Force genetics" test)
and augmentable via human(oid) engineering. The heroic Jedi are
thus emblems for a host of dangerously reactionary values and
assumptions."
After that hate filled rant, the writers include a
"JEDI connects justice initiatives to corporate capital. JEDI/Jedi is
more than just a name: It´s a product. Circulating that
product´s name can promote and benefit the corporation that owns
it, even if we do not mean to do so. We are, in effect, providing
that corporation-Disney-with a form of free advertising,
commodifying and cheapening our justice work in the process."
It's a brand name! But the authors "justice work" is already a
cheap and commodified product of corporate capital, and
their "racial hatred against whites is always justified"
mentality is plain sadistic and is intended to politically
sterilize whites and prevent them from criticizing Capital.
What a complete load of utter bollocks that quoted excerpt is! :-\
BTR1701
2024-07-16 02:29:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
https://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problematic-fo
r-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-inclusion/
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
theyŽre ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?

Is this like the African-American Vulcan nonsense on STAR TREK?
Post by Pluted Pup
and toxically masculine approaches to conflict resolution
(violent duels with phallic lightsabers, gaslighting by means of
"Jedi mind tricks," etc.). The Jedi are also an exclusionary
cult, membership to which is partly predicated on the possession
of heightened psychic and physical abilities (or
"Force-sensitivity").
Well, yeah. If you can't use the Force, it's impossible to be a Jedi.
It's pretty much in the definition.

It's like saying the Chicago Symphony is a bigoted organization
predicated on the possession of heightened musical ability to the
exclusion of everyone else.
anim8rfsk
2024-07-16 03:09:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
https://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problematic-fo
r-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-inclusion/
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they´re ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
Is this like the African-American Vulcan nonsense on STAR TREK?
You remember that too? The wounded woke screaming that of course there are
African-American Volans, and Native American Vulcans, and Asian American
Volans.
--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
Ubiquitous
2024-07-17 08:30:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by anim8rfsk
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problematic-for-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-inclusion/
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
theyŽre ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
Is this like the African-American Vulcan nonsense on STAR TREK?
You remember that too? The wounded woke screaming that of course there are
African-American Volans, and Native American Vulcans, and Asian American
Volans.
I don't see the point of making African-American or Asian-American Vorlons when they always wore those encounter suits around other races.

--
Let's go Brandon!
trotsky
2024-07-16 08:47:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
https://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problematic-fo
r-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-inclusion/
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they´re ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Post by BTR1701
Is this like the African-American Vulcan nonsense on STAR TREK?
Post by Pluted Pup
and toxically masculine approaches to conflict resolution
(violent duels with phallic lightsabers, gaslighting by means of
"Jedi mind tricks," etc.). The Jedi are also an exclusionary
cult, membership to which is partly predicated on the possession
of heightened psychic and physical abilities (or
"Force-sensitivity").
Well, yeah. If you can't use the Force, it's impossible to be a Jedi.
It's pretty much in the definition.
It's like saying the Chicago Symphony is a bigoted organization
predicated on the possession of heightened musical ability to the
exclusion of everyone else.
Ubiquitous
2024-07-17 08:30:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by trotsky
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problematic-for-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-inclusion/
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
theyŽre ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.

--
Let's go Brandon!
BTR1701
2024-07-17 14:43:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problemat
ic-for-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-incl
usion/
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.

I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
the top of my head without even needing to go back and look at the films:

Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu

And for some reason the grievance mongers seem to count Darth Vader as a
black guy for purposes of complaining that the only black character in
the original film was a villain. Apparently these lackbrains think that
wearing black clothing makes someone a black person.
Ubiquitous
2024-07-17 15:38:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-
problemat
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
ic-for-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-
incl
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
usion/
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
And for some reason the grievance mongers seem to count Darth Vader as a
black guy for purposes of complaining that the only black character in
the original film was a villain. Apparently these lackbrains think that
wearing black clothing makes someone a black person.
James Earl Jones doesn't count; He's the world's best blackface performer.


--
Let's go Brandon!
trotsky
2024-07-18 09:11:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That
Promote
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-
problemat
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
ic-for-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-
incl
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
usion/
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
And for some reason the grievance mongers seem to count Darth Vader as a
black guy for purposes of complaining that the only black character in
the original film was a villain. Apparently these lackbrains think that
wearing black clothing makes someone a black person.
James Earl Jones doesn't count; He's the world's best blackface performer.
http://youtu.be/F-TkK0ZNunY
No, he doesn't count because he was too fucking fat to be shown on
camera by the horribly shallow George Lucas. The fantastic
writer/director John Sayles had no problem with it in "Matewan," a
terrific movie. I will say, though, a scene where Jones was running to
catch a moving train was cringeworthy.
anim8rfsk
2024-07-17 16:11:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problemat
ic-for-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-incl
usion/
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
Ironically enough, Hutt’s captive dancer (we saw her booby)
Post by BTR1701
And for some reason the grievance mongers seem to count Darth Vader as a
black guy for purposes of complaining that the only black character in
the original film was a villain. Apparently these lackbrains think that
wearing black clothing makes someone a black person.
--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
BTR1701
2024-07-17 16:23:12 UTC
Permalink
In article
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
Ironically enough, Hutt's captive dancer (we saw her booby)
Does she count as black if she's painted green?
Post by BTR1701
And for some reason the grievance mongers seem to count Darth Vader as a
black guy for purposes of complaining that the only black character in
the original film was a villain. Apparently these lackbrains think that
wearing black clothing makes someone a black person.
anim8rfsk
2024-07-17 20:47:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
In article
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
Ironically enough, Hutt's captive dancer (we saw her booby)
Does she count as black if she's painted green?
She’s an Agro American
--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
BTR1701
2024-07-17 23:28:04 UTC
Permalink
In article
Post by BTR1701
In article
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
Ironically enough, Hutt's captive dancer (we saw her booby)
Does she count as black if she's painted green?
She’s an Agro American
A person of chlorophyl.
trotsky
2024-07-18 09:25:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
In article
Post by anim8rfsk
Post by BTR1701
In article
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
Ironically enough, Hutt's captive dancer (we saw her booby)
Does she count as black if she's painted green?
She’s an Agro American
A person of chlorophyl.
Does this exchange count as witty to gay people?
trotsky
2024-07-18 09:16:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
In article
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
Ironically enough, Hutt's captive dancer (we saw her booby)
Does she count as black if she's painted green?
Ah yes, the gay triumvirate is complete!
moviePig
2024-07-17 18:37:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problemat
ic-for-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-incl
usion/
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
And for some reason the grievance mongers seem to count Darth Vader as a
black guy for purposes of complaining that the only black character in
the original film was a villain. Apparently these lackbrains think that
wearing black clothing makes someone a black person.
Well, that and the actor who voiced him. Not much else to go on...

(And it *is* arguably true that he's in black *because* he's a villain.)
BTR1701
2024-07-17 18:44:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
And for some reason the grievance mongers seem to count Darth Vader as a
black guy for purposes of complaining that the only black character in
the original film was a villain. Apparently these lackbrains think that
wearing black clothing makes someone a black person.
Well, that and the actor who voiced him. Not much else to go on...
The actor who played him on screen was white and, most importantly,
within the story, the character is a white guy. One's race isn't defined
by the color of one's life support system.
(And it *is* arguably true that he's in black *because* he's a villain.)
There are a lot of STAR WARS villains-- Wilhuff Tarkin, for example, who
murdered 5 billion people on Alderaan-- who didn't wear black.
moviePig
2024-07-17 20:12:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
And for some reason the grievance mongers seem to count Darth Vader as a
black guy for purposes of complaining that the only black character in
the original film was a villain. Apparently these lackbrains think that
wearing black clothing makes someone a black person.
Well, that and the actor who voiced him. Not much else to go on...
The actor who played him on screen was white and, most importantly,
within the story, the character is a white guy. One's race isn't defined
by the color of one's life support system.
Just one's politics, I suppose.
Post by BTR1701
(And it *is* arguably true that he's in black *because* he's a villain.)
There are a lot of STAR WARS villains-- Wilhuff Tarkin, for example, who
murdered 5 billion people on Alderaan-- who didn't wear black.
Pale wannabes without that sonorous life support system...
trotsky
2024-07-18 09:20:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
And for some reason the grievance mongers seem to count Darth Vader as a
black guy for purposes of complaining that the only black character in
the original film was a villain. Apparently these lackbrains think that
wearing black clothing makes someone a black person.
Well, that and the actor who voiced him. Not much else to go on...
The actor who played him on screen was white and, most importantly,
within the story, the character is a white guy. One's race isn't defined
by the color of one's life support system.
(And it *is* arguably true that he's in black *because* he's a villain.)
There are a lot of STAR WARS villains-- Wilhuff Tarkin, for example, who
murdered 5 billion people on Alderaan-- who didn't wear black.
Will the real Slim Shady please stand up? You can't belong to the party
that whines like bitches about DEI and then out of the other side of
your mouth say "Oh yeah, fer sure, Lucas is totally a DEI guy." Please
make a note of this Assholio.
Your Name
2024-07-17 22:47:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problematic-for-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-inclusion/
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
And for some reason the grievance mongers seem to count Darth Vader as a
black guy for purposes of complaining that the only black character in
the original film was a villain. Apparently these lackbrains think that
wearing black clothing makes someone a black person.
Well, that and the actor who voiced him. Not much else to go on...
(And it *is* arguably true that he's in black *because* he's a villain.)
Bad guys wearing black goes back to long before Star Wars. In the old
cowboy movies, the bad guys tended to wear black hats while the good
guys wore white hats. This was partly done so the difference showed up
better in the early black-and-white movies and TV shows.
moviePig
2024-07-17 23:09:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Your Name
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problematic-for-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-inclusion/
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
And for some reason the grievance mongers seem to count Darth Vader as a
black guy for purposes of complaining that the only black character in
the original film was a villain. Apparently these lackbrains think that
wearing black clothing makes someone a black person.
Well, that and the actor who voiced him.  Not much else to go on...
(And it *is* arguably true that he's in black *because* he's a villain.)
Bad guys wearing black goes back to long before Star Wars. In the old
cowboy movies, the bad guys tended to wear black hats while the good
guys wore white hats. This was partly done so the difference showed up
better in the early black-and-white movies and TV shows.
In STAR WARS, the good guys wear white yoga pants. Brown accessories if
they're *really* good.
trotsky
2024-07-18 09:30:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Your Name
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problematic-for-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-inclusion/
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
And for some reason the grievance mongers seem to count Darth Vader as a
black guy for purposes of complaining that the only black character in
the original film was a villain. Apparently these lackbrains think that
wearing black clothing makes someone a black person.
Well, that and the actor who voiced him.  Not much else to go on...
(And it *is* arguably true that he's in black *because* he's a villain.)
Bad guys wearing black goes back to long before Star Wars. In the old
cowboy movies, the bad guys tended to wear black hats while the good
guys wore white hats. This was partly done so the difference showed up
better in the early black-and-white movies and TV shows.
In STAR WARS, the good guys wear white yoga pants.  Brown accessories if
they're *really* good.
What about the colors of their ultra phallic light sabers?
moviePig
2024-07-18 16:17:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by trotsky
Post by Your Name
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problematic-for-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-inclusion/
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
And for some reason the grievance mongers seem to count Darth Vader as a
black guy for purposes of complaining that the only black character in
the original film was a villain. Apparently these lackbrains think that
wearing black clothing makes someone a black person.
Well, that and the actor who voiced him.  Not much else to go on...
(And it *is* arguably true that he's in black *because* he's a villain.)
Bad guys wearing black goes back to long before Star Wars. In the old
cowboy movies, the bad guys tended to wear black hats while the good
guys wore white hats. This was partly done so the difference showed
up better in the early black-and-white movies and TV shows.
In STAR WARS, the good guys wear white yoga pants.  Brown accessories
if they're *really* good.
What about the colors of their ultra phallic light sabers?
I assumed those reflected temperament, like mood rings...
Your Name
2024-07-18 20:53:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by moviePig
Post by trotsky
Post by Your Name
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problematic-for-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-inclusion/
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi are
inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious order of
intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just
off the top of my head without even needing to go back and look at the
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
And for some reason the grievance mongers seem to count Darth Vader as
a black guy for purposes of complaining that the only black character
in the original film was a villain. Apparently these lackbrains think
that wearing black clothing makes someone a black person.
Well, that and the actor who voiced him.  Not much else to go on...
(And it *is* arguably true that he's in black *because* he's a villain.)
Bad guys wearing black goes back to long before Star Wars. In the old
cowboy movies, the bad guys tended to wear black hats while the good
guys wore white hats. This was partly done so the difference showed up
better in the early black-and-white movies and TV shows.
In STAR WARS, the good guys wear white yoga pants.  Brown accessories
if they're *really* good.
What about the colors of their ultra phallic light sabers?
I assumed those reflected temperament, like mood rings...
The baddies usually use red blades. The goodies use a variety of
colours - Samuel L. Jackson asked for his character to have a purple
blade.
Ubiquitous
2024-07-20 21:50:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Your Name
Post by moviePig
Post by trotsky
Post by Your Name
Bad guys wearing black goes back to long before Star Wars. In the old
cowboy movies, the bad guys tended to wear black hats while the good
guys wore white hats. This was partly done so the difference showed up
better in the early black-and-white movies and TV shows.
In STAR WARS, the good guys wear white yoga pants.  Brown accessories
if they're *really* good.
What about the colors of their ultra phallic light sabers?
I assumed those reflected temperament, like mood rings...
The baddies usually use red blades. The goodies use a variety of
colours - Samuel L. Jackson asked for his character to have a purple
blade.
No, Lesbian Headlight said in a post-show that the colors are arbitrary.

In fact, she shrugs at every fan theory told to her and says there was no
reason for what happened.

--
Let's go Brandon!

Ubiquitous
2024-07-20 00:12:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by moviePig
Post by trotsky
Post by Your Name
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human,
and of the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one
token black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney
and the DEI version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
And for some reason the grievance mongers seem to count Darth Vader as a
black guy for purposes of complaining that the only black character in
the original film was a villain. Apparently these lackbrains think that
wearing black clothing makes someone a black person.
Well, that and the actor who voiced him.  Not much else to go on...
(And it *is* arguably true that he's in black *because* he's a villain.)
Bad guys wearing black goes back to long before Star Wars. In the old
cowboy movies, the bad guys tended to wear black hats while the good
guys wore white hats. This was partly done so the difference showed
up better in the early black-and-white movies and TV shows.
In STAR WARS, the good guys wear white yoga pants.  Brown accessories
if they're *really* good.
What about the colors of their ultra phallic light sabers?
I assumed those reflected temperament, like mood rings...
You'd be wrong about that assumption. Lesbian Headlight herself said
she chose light saber colors based on what looked coolest.

--
Let's go Brandon!
trotsky
2024-07-18 09:17:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problemat
ic-for-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-incl
usion/
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
And for some reason the grievance mongers seem to count Darth Vader as a
black guy for purposes of complaining that the only black character in
the original film was a villain. Apparently these lackbrains think that
wearing black clothing makes someone a black person.
Well, that and the actor who voiced him.  Not much else to go on...
(And it *is* arguably true that he's in black *because* he's a villain.)
I wouldn't go that far. JEJ has a unique voice and it's in demand as such.
moviePig
2024-07-18 16:12:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problemat
ic-for-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-incl
usion/
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
And for some reason the grievance mongers seem to count Darth Vader as a
black guy for purposes of complaining that the only black character in
the original film was a villain. Apparently these lackbrains think that
wearing black clothing makes someone a black person.
Well, that and the actor who voiced him.  Not much else to go on...
(And it *is* arguably true that he's in black *because* he's a villain.)
I wouldn't go that far.  JEJ has a unique voice and it's in demand as such.
I know. I was momentarily overcome by the urge to participate...
trotsky
2024-07-19 09:13:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problemat
ic-for-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-incl
usion/
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
And for some reason the grievance mongers seem to count Darth Vader as a
black guy for purposes of complaining that the only black character in
the original film was a villain. Apparently these lackbrains think that
wearing black clothing makes someone a black person.
Well, that and the actor who voiced him.  Not much else to go on...
(And it *is* arguably true that he's in black *because* he's a villain.)
I wouldn't go that far.  JEJ has a unique voice and it's in demand as such.
I know.  I was momentarily overcome by the urge to participate...
And yet, being a movie pig you didn't even comment on my mention of John
Sayles and the superb Matewan?
moviePig
2024-07-19 16:32:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by trotsky
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problemat
ic-for-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-incl
usion/
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
And for some reason the grievance mongers seem to count Darth Vader as a
black guy for purposes of complaining that the only black character in
the original film was a villain. Apparently these lackbrains think that
wearing black clothing makes someone a black person.
Well, that and the actor who voiced him.  Not much else to go on...
(And it *is* arguably true that he's in black *because* he's a villain.)
I wouldn't go that far.  JEJ has a unique voice and it's in demand as such.
I know.  I was momentarily overcome by the urge to participate...
And yet, being a movie pig you didn't even comment on my mention of John
Sayles and the superb Matewan?
My urge to participate must've placed me in too great a hurry...
Ubiquitous
2024-07-18 01:08:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
I am sure somone with time to waste can Zabruder the crowd scenes and find
some black people milling about. Wasn't one of the pilots attacking the Death
Star black?

--
Let's go Brandon!
trotsky
2024-07-18 09:08:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problemat
ic-for-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-incl
usion/
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I love it when you gays take turns sharing the brain cell like this.
Post by BTR1701
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
and of
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
I'm not sure what you're trying to say, are you admitting you lied?
Because you've had the brains or the spine to do this before, so I doubt
you're turning over a new leaf now. I can't even imagine what's it's
like to be too weak to turn over a new leaf, that's gotta suck!!!
Post by BTR1701
And for some reason the grievance mongers seem to count Darth Vader as a
black guy for purposes of complaining that the only black character in
the original film was a villain. Apparently these lackbrains think that
wearing black clothing makes someone a black person.
BTR1701
2024-07-18 17:06:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by trotsky
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I love it when you gays take turns sharing the brain cell like this.
Post by BTR1701
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
I'm not sure what you're trying to say, are you admitting you lied?
No. You did:

"There was exactly one token black dude in Lucas's universe"

When you use the words "exactly one" it kinda limits your ability to
wriggle out of it when three are presented to you in rebuttal, Hutt, you
oozing lump.
trotsky
2024-07-19 08:55:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by trotsky
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by BTR1701
Post by Pluted Pup
Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
"The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice. Although
they're ostensibly heroes within the Star Wars universe, the Jedi
are inappropriate symbols for justice work. They are a religious
order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism
How are they white saviors when most of them aren't even human, and of
the humans, plenty of them are non-white?
More lies from the resident sack of shit. There was exactly one token
black dude in Lucas's universe until you sold out to Disney and the DEI
version came along.
Get back to us when you learn how to count past one.
No shit. Hutt seems to rejoice in being publicly wrong about everything.
I love it when you gays take turns sharing the brain cell like this.
Post by BTR1701
I can think of three major black characters in Lucas's universe just off
Finn
Lando Calrissian
Mace Windu
I'm not sure what you're trying to say, are you admitting you lied?
"There was exactly one token black dude in Lucas's universe"
You are REALLY bad with this wordplay thing. If you were actually a
Lucas fan, you would say there are no token blacks. But you've tacitly
admitted that there are, and now we just need to agree on the number.

I played you like the MAGA asshole you are. Sorry, not sorry.
Post by BTR1701
When you use the words "exactly one" it kinda limits your ability to
wriggle out of it when three are presented to you in rebuttal, Hutt, you
oozing lump.
Sandra Hees
2024-07-17 00:18:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ubiquitous
Why the Term ‘JEDI’ Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problematic-for-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-inclusion/
Why don't they ask George Lucas what it means instead of supposing what
it means by creating absurd theories? Lucas created that universe and
names. He's the one that really knows what every terminology means in
the Star Wars universe
Loading...